Angelcynn 1.10 Muster questions

A place to read and talk about our official updates, errata and addenda for Darklands. Please post all rules queries here!
User avatar
jereme
Posts: 125
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:33 pm
Contact:

Angelcynn 1.10 Muster questions

Postby jereme » Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:47 am

  • Penda: Naegling should be "sorcerous sword". However, if sorcerous, can Urbad "break" it?
  • Fram: should have mount only.
  • Meloda: should have trait "Sorcerer". Is any of her gear "sorcerous"?
  • Forthegn: guthelm and guthbyrne should have Replacement (Helm and Byrne)
  • Thegn: guthelm and guthbyrne should have Replacement (Helm and Byrne)
  • Wiglere: should the girdstaef be Sorcerous?
  • Gesith: should their combat weapons have "switch (X)"?
User avatar
Rob Lane
Site Admin
Posts: 3709
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:46 pm
Location: Warsop Vale, Nottinghamshire
Contact:

Re: Angelcynn 1.10 Muster questions

Postby Rob Lane » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:49 am

jereme wrote:
  • Penda: Naegling should be "sorcerous sword". However, if sorcerous, can Urbad "break" it?


Nægling isn't Sorcerous, it's just an old sword with a big reputation.

jereme wrote:
  • Fram: should have mount only.


  • Fram should be an Ardent Mount too!

    jereme wrote:
  • Meloda: should have trait "Sorcerer". Is any of her gear "sorcerous"?


  • Yes, and no.

    jereme wrote:
  • Forthegn: guthelm and guthbyrne should have Replacement (Helm and Byrne)


  • Yep.

    jereme wrote:
  • Thegn: guthelm and guthbyrne should have Replacement (Helm and Byrne)


  • Yep.

    jereme wrote:
  • Wiglere: should the girdstaef be Sorcerous?


  • Yes, it should.

    jereme wrote:
  • Gesith: should their combat weapons have "switch (X)"?


  • No - they can wield both, with spear in shield hand. It's intentional.


    Once again, fantastic work Jereme - keep it up!
    nielsene
    Posts: 6
    Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:37 pm

    Re: Angelcynn 1.10 Muster questions

    Postby nielsene » Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:46 am

    The forthegn's warhammer and armor upgrades seem to show the wrong calculated numbers (M+W), (C+A)

    Edit: actually the armor upgrade is correct, but it already includes the shield's bonus too. Slightly confusing, but I guess still correct. The warhammer is still off.
    User avatar
    Rob Lane
    Site Admin
    Posts: 3709
    Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:46 pm
    Location: Warsop Vale, Nottinghamshire
    Contact:

    Re: Angelcynn 1.10 Muster questions

    Postby Rob Lane » Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:45 pm

    I think this is all fixed now?

    Return to “Darklands Rules and Musters - Updates, Errata and Addenda”

    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests